It is with great pleasure that I share the following
editorial, “Sex Offender Treatment: Two Promising Approaches” published in the
inaugural issue of Sociology and Criminology. This innovative open access journal promises to appeal to a wide range of audiences interested in criminology and criminal justice. The OMICS Group Special features of the
journal ensure rapid dissemination of high quality studies in the discipline.
This commentary focuses on an important and controversial public policy issue
in our field–sex offender treatment. It argues that in conjunction with
punishment, treatment efforts should also be considered for sex offender
management in the U.S.
The current revolt against the Syrian regime has strong
historical antecedents. The Muslim Brotherhood insurgency from 1978-1982
challenged Hafez al- Assad Baathist regime’s right to rule. The Baathists were secular Arab nationalists who borrowed from European fascistic, anti-Semitic and communist ideas. They embraced a sectarian policy of support for minorities
building upon the colonial era patronage of Muslim and Christian minorities
within the context of a secular socialist state. They, however, were careful
not to alienate the Sunni majority and under successive regimes forged alliances
with Sunni economic elites.
However, such phenomenal
circumstances have not been given serious consideration by most current
students of the China’s reforms, who usually neglected the irreversible political transitions away from Leninism in Communist countries; nor do my
findings support theories of political development, which see political
coalitions only as alignments between the state and organized social interests,
such as parties and interest groups. The deficiency of both types of
explanations prohibits them from correctly explaining new political events in
the Chinese economic decentralization.