This study presents an exploratory analysis of the meaning of
“hooking up” based on 1) academic literature, and 2) the perspective of college students from differing backgrounds. The authors investigated definitions of
hooking up based on scholarly articles derived from search engine results and
then from college students’ responses to an open-ended question on an online
survey (N=358).
Coding was used to identify themes that emerged from the data
with the goal of understanding what the phrase means and whether the research
is in line with students’ perspectives. Additionally, the authors sought to examine whether differences exist based on demographic variables. The findings
revealed that the phrase “hooking up” predominantly represents sexual behavior
ranging from kissing to sexual intercourse in the research base, but has been
more narrowly constructed among college students. Gender differences also
emerged, with males being more likely than females to view hooking up as
involving sex rather than a broader range of sexual behaviors. A discussion
follows and highlights directions for future research.
It is with great pleasure that I share the following
editorial, “Sex Offender Treatment: Two Promising Approaches” published in the
inaugural issue of Sociology and Criminology. This innovative open access journal promises to appeal to a wide range of audiences interested in criminology and criminal justice. The OMICS Group Special features of the
journal ensure rapid dissemination of high quality studies in the discipline.
This commentary focuses on an important and controversial public policy issue
in our field–sex offender treatment. It argues that in conjunction with
punishment, treatment efforts should also be considered for sex offender
management in the U.S.
System
level outcomes include: 1) the creation and continuation of a system of care
for the target group, including natural and community supports; and 2) the
impact of cultural issues on treatment and integrated service planning.
Individual client-level outcomes include: 1) reduced juvenile justice systems involvement and reduced incarceration and out-of-home placements; 2) improved
school performance and attendance; 3) accurate and timely behavioral health
screening; 4) improved clinical outcomes; and 5) improved satisfaction with
services.
